The NBA Finals resume tonight with a home game for the Indiana Pacers, tied 1-1 with the Oklahoma City Thunder. Sports business reporter Randall Williams has been listening to all the talk around this small-market championship series and thinks a lot of it is misplaced. Plus: Tariffs create an opening for Canadian warehouses, and more students from Africa are applying for MBAs in the US. Help us improve Bloomberg newsletters: Take a quick survey to share your thoughts on your signup experience and what you'd like to see in the future. If this email was forwarded to you, click here to sign up. The NBA Finals are easily the most glamorous, star-studded sporting event of the early summer. Yet this year the lights don't appear to be as bright. A lot of folks are gossiping about why, but let's get to the facts and dispel some fiction. This year's contest features the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers. The Thunder had one of the most dominant regular seasons in NBA history, with an average margin of victory of 12.87 points, the highest ever. The Pacers have had an electric postseason, pulling off several miraculous comebacks—Tyrese Haliburton hit his fourth game-winning shot in the Finals' opener. Additionally, the Thunder have a superstar in league MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and an incredible defense. The Pacers' fast-paced style of basketball should be appealing to casual watchers. And yet, Game 1 of the series saw 8.91 million viewers tune in, making it the least-watched Game 1 since 1988 (excluding the Covid-19 seasons of 2020 and 2021). The numbers were worse for Game 2, with 8.76 million viewers, according to Sports Media Watch. So what exactly is the issue, and is there an issue at all? Plenty of fans in the stands at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City for Game 2 of the NBA Finals. Photographer: Ron Hoskins/NBAE/Getty Images Some sports fans will point to the fact that two small-market teams are playing. Indianapolis and Oklahoma City rank 21st and 25th, respectively, in terms of the NBA's largest media markets. In other words, the matchup isn't sexy. To that I say, "Who cares?" After the Milwaukee Bucks won the 2021 Finals, viewership for their games increased 21% the next season, according to the NBA. Two years later when the Denver Nuggets won the championship, their viewership increased 32%. No matter the market size, people love winners. At the same time, though, big name sports commentators and analysts aren't helping to sell the matchup either. "This series feels like that Saturday Night Live when the celebrity host doesn't have a lot of star power and you're kind of wishing Tom Hanks would host it," said Colin Cowherd, host of Fox Sports' The Herd With Colin Cowherd. "It's not going to be a series we talk about much in between games." Comments like these have plagued the NBA throughout the 2024-25 season. At the outset, the league was up against 2024 presidential election coverage, the MLB playoffs and the middle of the NFL season, but its overall viewership decline was only 2%. When the playoffs rolled around, viewership was up 12% during the conference semifinals and ratings weren't talked about as much. I find the constant conversation about viewership weird. I cover a bunch of pro sports leagues, and in no other sport have I seen fans and media pundits alike zero in on the business of a league like they're doing to the NBA right now. So before Game 1, I asked NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about it. "Even for me sort of walking on the street, fans coming up to me, it frustrates me that the first thing they say is, 'How are the ratings? What are the ratings going to be?' As opposed to, 'Wow, you have two incredible conference finals, what a great playoff series you've had.' I think it seeps into our coverage, quite honestly," Silver said. The reality is, the NBA isn't in trouble, but it is having growing pains. Yes, growing pains in year 79. Superstars such as Stephen Curry, Kevin Durant, LeBron James and Kawhi Leonard have been the biggest draw for viewers over the past 15 seasons. But their careers are winding down, meaning it's time for new, young stars to fill their shoes. In the previous Finals, the trio of Jaylen Brown, Jayson Tatum and Luka Dončić failed to deliver signature captivating performances. The Boston Celtics won in five games over the Dallas Mavericks. The year before, the Denver Nuggets' three-time MVP Nikola Jokić, played great, but he treats basketball like a nine-to-five. So far, Shai is balling, but if the NBA and its media partners don't promote him like he's the next big thing, viewers won't believe it either. The last thing I'll say is the NBA signed an 11-year, $76 billion media deal with Disney/ESPN, Comcast/NBC/Peacock and Amazon that hasn't even kicked in yet. That money is fully guaranteed until the end of the 2035-36 season, no matter if the Los Angeles Lakers or the Charlotte Hornets (don't laugh!) are the ultimate champion. So while people continue to throw shade, the NBA's business is shining. People talk, money shouts. Sign up for Bloomberg's Business of Sports newsletter for the context you need on the collision of power, money and sports, from the latest deals to the newest stakeholders |