Thursday, April 17, 2025

Climate: Here’s what to know about tariffs and renewable energy

The shift to cleaner power needs resources from China. An export ban just cut off some supplies.
All NewslettersRead online
New York Times logo
Climate Forward
For subscribersApril 17, 2025
An aerial photo shows several tiered levels of grayish earth in a huge open-pit mine.
A rare earth mine in the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region of China. Wu Changqing/VCG, via Getty Images

China and the energy transition

In 1886, a French chemist dissolved holmium oxide in acid. Then, he added ammonia. Toiling over the marble slab of his fireplace, he repeated the procedure dozens of times.

Finally, voilà: He'd extracted a new element.

More than a century later, Paul-Émile Lecoq de Boisbaudran's painstaking discovery — which he named dysprosium, from the Greek for "hard to get" — is a crucial ingredient in the powerful magnets used in wind turbines and electric vehicle motors.

If the world is to succeed in its efforts to slow global warming, it will need dysprosium. It will also need a suite of other rare earth elements and minerals that many of us first heard about this week when China announced export controls that would effectively cut off the global supply of seven rare earths.

China's export ban, part of the country's retaliation for President Trump's steep new tariffs, has exposed the extent to which the global energy transition depends on raw materials produced by China.

It's not just rare earths, as my colleague Max Bearak and I reported this week. China supplies more than half of the 50 minerals the U.S. government has deemed critical to national security and the economy.

Among those critical minerals are lithium, cobalt and nickel, components of the rechargeable batteries that power electric vehicles and store energy on the grid when the weather is unfavorable for wind and solar generation. China refines or mines significant portions of the world's supply of all three, and Chinese companies have acquired major stakes in mineral-rich countries: nickel in Indonesia, cobalt in the Democratic Republic of Congo, lithium in Zimbabwe.

"China's influence over critical mineral supply chains is far greater than trade data alone suggests," said Krista Rasmussen, director of natural resource security at C4ADS, a research organization based in Washington that has traced Chinese companies' hidden ownership of Indonesian nickel refineries. "Chinese firms exert substantial control across nearly every stage of the supply chain."

Some critical minerals are far more abundant than rare earths, and American mining companies have been engaged for years in extracting them domestically and around the world, though at a fraction of the scale of Chinese companies.

Mr. Trump has sought to increase American access to certain critical minerals through deals with Ukraine and Congo, and there are deposits in Canada and Greenland, two places he has mused about annexing.

Rare earths, on the other hand, have narrower supply chains and are often more difficult to extract, requiring more cumbersome processes to separate them from other minerals (as Lecoq de Boisbaudran learned). The United States has just one operational rare earth mine, in Mountain Pass, Calif., which produces around 15 percent of global rare earths.

China's rare earths export ban applies to all countries, not just the United States, meaning the U.S. will able unable to acquire the banned commodities through intermediaries. U.S. companies have stockpiled rare earth inventories that can tide them over, but they will not last forever, said Pavel Molchanov, an analyst at Raymond James who specializes in the mineral trade.

"If we are still having this conversation six-plus months from now, that's when we would begin to get worried about physical shortages," Molchanov said, "but not right now."

A tiny sea turtle paddles into the ocean on a beach.
A loggerhead sea turtle hatchling made its way to the ocean from Ossabaw Island, Ga. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, via Associated Press

A key wildlife protection could soon end

The Trump administration is moving to effectively eliminate a crucial protection in the Endangered Species Act by redefining a single word: harm. A proposed rule issued this week would repeal a longstanding interpretation of what it means to harm imperiled plants and animals, and the destruction of habitat, the single biggest reason that many species face extinction, would no longer count. — Lisa Friedman

OTHER CLIMATE NEWS

A man wipes his face while putting out spot fires. Flames are seen behind him.

Max Whittaker for The New York Times

Trump Cuts Likely to Curtail Study of Climate Change's Health Effects

The N.I.H. has indicated that it will stop funding research on the topic. Scientists said that would make it harder to protect people.

By Maggie Astor

A person leans over and adjusts some cables attached to the bottom of a white weather balloon.

William Widmer for The New York Times

Weather Service Prepares for 'Degraded Operations' Amid Trump Cuts

An internal document describes how severe shortages of meteorologists and other staff members could affect forecasts and other operations.

By Lisa Friedman

Judge Tanya Chutkan, wearing a black-and-white patterned top, talks with person in a blue suit.

Mark Schiefelbein/Associated Press

2 Judges Order Federal Agencies to Unfreeze Climate Money

The rulings are setbacks to Trump's efforts to halt climate and environmental funding approved under the Biden administration.

By Claire Brown and Karen Zraick

A fire truck in front of a burning home at night.

Loren Elliott for The New York Times

Climate Change Is Stressing the World's Blood Supplies

Extreme weather disasters, increasing as the planet warms, can curb blood donations while increasing demand, a new analysis found.

By Rebecca Dzombak

Thanks for being a subscriber.

Read past editions of the newsletter here.

If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here. Browse all of our subscriber-only newsletters here. And follow The New York Times on Instagram, Threads, Facebook and TikTok at @nytimes.

Reach us at climateforward@nytimes.com. We read every message, and reply to many!

An illustration of wavy bands, as if on a chart. The ones at the bottom are cooler blues. Moving up, the colors shift from greens to warmer oranges and, finally, to reds.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for Climate Forward from The New York Times.

To stop receiving Climate Forward, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings. To opt out of updates and offers sent from The Athletic, submit a request.

Explore more subscriber-only newsletters.

Connect with us on:

xwhatsapp

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Share: